Diagnosis and Treatment > Investigation > Psychometric assessment
You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items
Search for other papers by Kate Laycock in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Abhijit Chaudhuri in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Charlotte Fuller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Zahra Khatami in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Frederick Nkonge in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nemanja Stojanovic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Hashimoto’s encephalopathy (HE) is rarely reported with only a few hundred cases published. Diagnosis is made in patients with an appropriate clinical picture and high antithyroperoxidase (anti-TPO) antibodies after infectious, toxic and metabolic causes of encephalopathy have been excluded. There is little objective data on the neurocognitive impairment in patients with HE and their improvement with treatment. We present the case of a 28-year-old woman with HE. Approach to management was novel as objective neuropsychological assessment was used to assess her clinical condition and response to treatment. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) as the first-line treatment instead of steroids. She responded well. The case illustrates that a different approach is required for the diagnosis and treatment of HE. A new diagnostic criteria is proposed that includes neurocognitive assessment, serum and CSF antibodies, an abnormal EEG and exclusion of other causes of encephalopathy. Furthermore, treatment should be tailored to the patient.
Learning points:
-
Neurocognitive assessment should be carried out to assess the extent of brain involvement in suspected Hashimoto’s encephalopathy pre- and post- treatment.
-
Treatment of Hashimoto’s encephalopathy should be tailored to the patient.
-
Unifying diagnostic criteria for Hashimoto’s encephalopathy must be established.
Search for other papers by J Bukowczan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by K Lois in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by M Mathiopoulou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A B Grossman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by R A James in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Giant prolactinomas are rare tumours of the pituitary, which typically exceed 40 mm in their largest dimension. Impairment of higher cognitive function has been noted post-operatively after transcranial surgery and as a long-term consequence of the radiotherapy treatment. However, there has been little that is reported on such disturbances in relation to the tumour per se, and to our knowledge, there has been none in terms of responsivity to dopamine agonist therapy and shrinkage in these tumours. We present a case of successful restoration of severely impaired cognitive functions achieved safely after significant adenoma involution with medical treatment alone.
Learning points
-
Giant prolactinomas can be present with profound cognitive defects.
-
Dopamine agonists remain in the mainstay first-line treatment of giant prolactinomas.
-
Mechanisms of the reversible cognitive impairment associated with giant prolactinoma treatment appear to be complex and remain open to further studies.
-
Young patients with giant prolactinomas mandate genetic testing towards familial predisposition.
