Diagnosis and Treatment > Medication

You are looking at 11 - 20 of 25 items for :

  • Dopamine agonists x
Clear All
Shinsuke Uraki The 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan

Search for other papers by Shinsuke Uraki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hiroyuki Ariyasu The 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan

Search for other papers by Hiroyuki Ariyasu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Asako Doi The 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan

Search for other papers by Asako Doi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hiroto Furuta The 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan

Search for other papers by Hiroto Furuta in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Masahiro Nishi The 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan

Search for other papers by Masahiro Nishi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Takeshi Usui Department of Medical Genetics, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka City, Japan

Search for other papers by Takeshi Usui in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Hiroki Yamaue The 2nd Department of Surgery, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan

Search for other papers by Hiroki Yamaue in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Takashi Akamizu The 1st Department of Internal Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan

Search for other papers by Takashi Akamizu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

A 54-year-old man had gastrinoma, parathyroid hyperplasia and pituitary tumor. His family history indicated that he might have multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1). MEN1 gene analysis revealed a heterozygous germline mutation (Gly156Arg). Therefore, we diagnosed him with MEN1. Endocrinological tests revealed that his serum prolactin (PRL) and plasma adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) levels were elevated to 1699 ng/mL and 125 pg/mL respectively. Immunohistochemical analysis of the resected pancreatic tumors revealed that the tumors did not express ACTH. Overnight 0.5 and 8 mg dexamethasone suppression tests indicated that his pituitary tumor was a PRL-ACTH-producing plurihormonal tumor. Before transsphenoidal surgery, cabergoline was initiated. Despite no decrease in the volume of the pituitary tumor, PRL and ACTH levels decreased to 37.8 ng/mL and 57.6 pg/mL respectively. Owing to the emergence of metastatic gastrinoma in the liver, octreotide was initiated. After that, PRL and ACTH levels further decreased to 5.1 ng/mL and 19.7 pg/mL respectively. He died from liver dysfunction, and an autopsy of the pituitary tumor was performed. In the autopsy study, histopathological and immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis showed that the tumor was single adenoma and the cells were positive for ACTH, growth hormone (GH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and PRL. RT-PCR analysis showed that the tumor expressed mRNA encoding all anterior pituitary hormones, pituitary transcription factor excluding estrogen receptor (ER) β, somatostatin receptor (SSTR) 2, SSTR5 and dopamine receptor D (D2R). PRL-ACTH-producing tumor is a very rare type of pituitary tumor, and treatment with cabergoline and octreotide may be useful for controlling hormone levels secreted from a plurihormonal pituitary adenoma, as seen in this case of MEN1.

Learning points:

  • Although plurihormonal pituitary adenomas were reported to be more frequent in patients with MEN1 than in those without, the combination of PRL and ACTH is rare.

  • RT-PCR analysis showed that the pituitary tumor expressed various pituitary transcription factors and IHC analysis revealed that the tumor was positive for PRL, ACTH, GH and LH.

  • Generally, the effectiveness of dopamine agonist and somatostatin analog in corticotroph adenomas is low; however, if the plurihormonal pituitary adenoma producing ACTH expresses SSTR2, SSTR5 and D2R, medical therapy for the pituitary adenoma may be effective.

Open access
Nikolaos Kyriakakis Leeds Centre for Diabetes and Endocrinology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK

Search for other papers by Nikolaos Kyriakakis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jacqueline Trouillas Centre de Pathologie Est, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est, University of Lyon, Lyon, France

Search for other papers by Jacqueline Trouillas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mary N Dang Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for other papers by Mary N Dang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Julie Lynch Leeds Centre for Diabetes and Endocrinology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK

Search for other papers by Julie Lynch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Paul Belchetz Leeds Centre for Diabetes and Endocrinology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK

Search for other papers by Paul Belchetz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Márta Korbonits Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for other papers by Márta Korbonits in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Robert D Murray Leeds Centre for Diabetes and Endocrinology, St James’s University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK

Search for other papers by Robert D Murray in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

A male patient presented at the age of 30 with classic clinical features of acromegaly and was found to have elevated growth hormone levels, not suppressing during an oral glucose tolerance test. His acromegaly was originally considered to be of pituitary origin, based on a CT scan, which was interpreted as showing a pituitary macroadenoma. Despite two trans-sphenoidal surgeries, cranial radiotherapy and periods of treatment with bromocriptine and octreotide, his acromegaly remained active clinically and biochemically. A lung mass was discovered incidentally on a chest X-ray performed as part of a routine pre-assessment for spinal surgery 5 years following the initial presentation. This was confirmed to be a bronchial carcinoid tumour, which was strongly positive for growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin receptor type 2 by immunohistochemistry. The re-examination of the pituitary specimens asserted the diagnosis of pituitary GH hyperplasia. Complete resolution of the patient’s acromegaly was achieved following right lower and middle lobectomy. Seventeen years following the successful resection of the bronchial carcinoid tumour the patient remains under annual endocrine follow-up for monitoring of the hypopituitarism he developed after the original interventions to his pituitary gland, while there has been no evidence of active acromegaly or recurrence of the carcinoid tumour. Ectopic acromegaly is extremely rare, accounting for <1% of all cases of acromegaly. Our case highlights the diagnostic challenges differentiating between ectopic acromegaly and acromegaly of pituitary origin and emphasises the importance of avoiding unnecessary pituitary surgery and radiotherapy. The role of laboratory investigations, imaging and histology as diagnostic tools is discussed.

Learning points:

  • Ectopic acromegaly is rare, accounting for less than 1% of all cases of acromegaly.

  • Ectopic acromegaly is almost always due to extra-pituitary GHRH secretion, mainly from neuroendocrine tumours of pancreatic or bronchial origin.

  • Differentiating between acromegaly of pituitary origin and ectopic acromegaly can cause diagnostic challenges due to similarities in clinical presentation and biochemistry.

  • Serum GHRH can be a useful diagnostic tool to diagnose ectopic acromegaly.

  • Pituitary imaging is crucial to differentiate between a pituitary adenoma and pituitary hyperplasia, which is a common finding in ectopic acromegaly.

  • Diagnosing ectopic acromegaly is pivotal to avoid unnecessary interventions to the pituitary and preserve normal pituitary function.

Open access
Emilia Sbardella Department of Endocrinology, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

Search for other papers by Emilia Sbardella in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
George Farah Department of Endocrinology, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by George Farah in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Ahmed Fathelrahman Department of Endocrinology, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by Ahmed Fathelrahman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Simon Cudlip Department of Neurological Surgery

Search for other papers by Simon Cudlip in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Olaf Ansorge Department of Neuropathology, John Radcliffe Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by Olaf Ansorge in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Niki Karavitaki Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham and Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partner, Birmingham, UK

Search for other papers by Niki Karavitaki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Ashley B Grossman Department of Endocrinology, Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Search for other papers by Ashley B Grossman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

Pituitary adenomas are a common intracranial neoplasm, usually demonstrating a benign phenotype. They can be classified according to pathological, radiological or clinical behaviour as typical, atypical or carcinomas, invasive or noninvasive, and aggressive or nonaggressive. Prolactinomas account for 40–60% of all pituitary adenomas, with dopamine agonists representing the first-line treatment and surgery/radiotherapy reserved for drug intolerance/resistance or in neuro-ophthalmological emergencies. We present the case of a 62-year-old man with an apparently indolent prolactin-secreting macroadenoma managed with partial resection and initially showing a biochemical response to cabergoline. Five years later, the tumour became resistant to cabergoline, despite a substantial increase in dosage, showing rapid growth and causing worsening of vision. The patient then underwent two further transsphenoidal operations and continued on high-dose cabergoline; despite these interventions, the tumour continued enlarging and prolactin increased to 107 269 U/L. Histology of the third surgical specimen demonstrated features of aggressive behaviour (atypical adenoma with a high cell proliferation index) not present in the tumour removed at the first operation. Subsequently, he was referred for radiotherapy aiming to control tumour growth.

Learning points:

  • The development of secondary resistance to dopamine agonists (DAs) is a serious sign as it may be associated with de-differentiation of the prolactinoma and thus of aggressive or malignant transformation.

  • Significant de-differentiation of the adenoma documented on consecutive histologies suggests a possible transition to malignancy.

  • A combination of histological ‘alarm’ features associated with persistent growth and escape from DAs treatment in recurrent adenomas should alert clinicians and demands close follow-up.

  • A multidisciplinary approach by pathologists, endocrinologists and neurosurgeons is essential.

Open access
Ekaterina Manuylova Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Search for other papers by Ekaterina Manuylova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Laura M Calvi Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Search for other papers by Laura M Calvi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Catherine Hastings Department of Neurosurgery

Search for other papers by Catherine Hastings in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
G Edward Vates Department of Neurosurgery

Search for other papers by G Edward Vates in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mahlon D Johnson Department of Pathology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA

Search for other papers by Mahlon D Johnson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
William T Cave Jr Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Search for other papers by William T Cave Jr in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Ismat Shafiq Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism

Search for other papers by Ismat Shafiq in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

Co-secretion of growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) from a single pituitary adenoma is common. In fact, up to 25% of patients with acromegaly may have PRL co-secretion. The prevalence of acromegaly among patients with a newly diagnosed prolactinoma is unknown. Given the possibility of mixed GH and PRL co-secretion, the current recommendation is to obtain an insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in patients with prolactinoma at the initial diagnosis. Long-term follow-up of IGF-1 is not routinely done. Here, we report two cases of well-controlled prolactinoma on dopamine agonists with the development of acromegaly 10–20 years after the initial diagnoses. In both patients, a mixed PRL/GH-cosecreting adenoma was confirmed on the pathology examination after transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). Therefore, periodic routine measurements of IGF-1 should be considered regardless of the duration and biochemical control of prolactinoma.

Learning points:

  • Acromegaly can develop in patients with well-controlled prolactinoma on dopamine agonists.

  • The interval between prolactinoma and acromegaly diagnoses can be several decades.

  • Periodic screening of patients with prolactinoma for growth hormone excess should be considered and can 
lead to an early diagnosis of acromegaly before the development of complications.

Open access
Ilse C A Bakker Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Ilse C A Bakker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Chris D Schubart Department of Psychiatry, Tergooi Hospital, Hilversum, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Chris D Schubart in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Pierre M J Zelissen Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands

Search for other papers by Pierre M J Zelissen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

In this report, we describe a female patient with both prolactinoma and psychotic disorder who was successfully treated with aripiprazole, a partial dopamine 2 receptor agonist. During the follow-up of more than 10 years, her psychotic symptoms improved considerably, prolactin levels normalised and the size of the prolactinoma decreased. This observation may be of clinical relevance in similar patients who often are difficult to treat with the regular dopaminergic drugs.

Learning points

  • Prolactinoma coinciding with psychosis can represent a therapeutic challenge.

  • In contrast to many other antipsychotic drugs, aripiprazole is associated with a decrease in prolactin levels.

  • Aripiprazole can be a valuable pharmaceutical tool to treat both prolactinoma and psychosis.

Open access
J Bukowczan Regional Pituitary Tumour Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK

Search for other papers by J Bukowczan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
K Lois Regional Pituitary Tumour Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK

Search for other papers by K Lois in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M Mathiopoulou Regional Pituitary Tumour Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK

Search for other papers by M Mathiopoulou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A B Grossman Oxford Centre for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, Churchill Hospital, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK

Search for other papers by A B Grossman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
R A James Regional Pituitary Tumour Service, Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK

Search for other papers by R A James in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

Giant prolactinomas are rare tumours of the pituitary, which typically exceed 40 mm in their largest dimension. Impairment of higher cognitive function has been noted post-operatively after transcranial surgery and as a long-term consequence of the radiotherapy treatment. However, there has been little that is reported on such disturbances in relation to the tumour per se, and to our knowledge, there has been none in terms of responsivity to dopamine agonist therapy and shrinkage in these tumours. We present a case of successful restoration of severely impaired cognitive functions achieved safely after significant adenoma involution with medical treatment alone.

Learning points

  • Giant prolactinomas can be present with profound cognitive defects.

  • Dopamine agonists remain in the mainstay first-line treatment of giant prolactinomas.

  • Mechanisms of the reversible cognitive impairment associated with giant prolactinoma treatment appear to be complex and remain open to further studies.

  • Young patients with giant prolactinomas mandate genetic testing towards familial predisposition.

Open access
Niki Margari Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Niki Margari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jonathan Pollock Department of Neurosurgery, Queens Hospital, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford, Essex, UK

Search for other papers by Jonathan Pollock in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Nemanja Stojanovic Department of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Queens Hospital, Barking Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford, Essex, UK

Search for other papers by Nemanja Stojanovic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

Prolactinomas constitute the largest subsection of all secretory pituitary adenomas. Most are microprolactinomas and are satisfactorily treated by medical management alone. Giant prolactinomas, measuring more than 4 cm in diameter, are rare and usually occur more commonly in men. Macroprolatinomas tend to present with symptoms of mass effect rather than those of hyperprolactinaemia. Dopamine agonists (DA) are the treatment of choice for all prolactinomas. Surgery is usually reserved for DA resistance or if vision is threatened by the mass effects of the tumour. We describe the case of a 52 year-old woman with a giant invasive prolactinoma who required multiple surgical procedures as well as medical management with DA. One of the surgical interventions required a posterior approach via the trans cranial sub occipital transtentorial approach, a surgical technique that has not been previously described in the medical literature for this indication. The giant prolactinoma was reduced significantly with the above approach and patient symptoms from the compressing effects of the tumour were resolved. This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the management of such patients who present with florid neurological sequelae secondary to pressure effects. Although this presentation is uncommon, surgery via a sub occipital transtentorial approach may be considered the treatment of choice in suitable patients with giant invasive prolactinomas compressing the brainstem.

Learning points

  • Giant prolactinomas present with symptoms of mass effect or those of hyperprolactinaemia.

  • Interpretation of the pituitary profile is crucial to guide further investigations and management.

  • Treatment of giant invasive prolactinomas may involve a combination of medical management and multiple surgical interventions.

  • Treatment with DA may cause pituitary haemorrhage or infarction in patients with these tumours.

  • A sub occipital transtetorial approach may be considered the treatment of choice in invasive prolactinomas compressing the brainstem.

  • Multidisciplinary approach of such patients is fundamental for a better outcome.

Open access
Lisa Burback Alberta Hospital Edmonton, Addiction and Mental Health Program, Alberta Health Services, 17480 Fort Road, Post Office Box 307, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T5J 2J7

Search for other papers by Lisa Burback in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

A previously healthy 32-year-old woman developed cyclical mood swings after being prescribed cabergoline for a pituitary microprolactinoma. These mood swings persisted for over 2 years, at which point she developed an acute manic episode with psychotic features and was admitted to a psychiatry unit. Cabergoline was discontinued and replaced with aripiprazole 10 mg/day. Her manic episode quickly resolved, and she was discharged within 6 days of admission. The aripiprazole suppressed her prolactin levels for over 18 months of follow-up, even after the dose was lowered to 2 mg/day. There was no significant change in tumor size over 15 months, treatment was well tolerated. However, after 9 months of taking 2 mg aripiprazole, she developed brief manic symptoms, and the dose was returned to 10 mg daily, with good effect.

Learning points

  • Dopamine agonists such as cabergoline, which are a standard treatment for microprolactinomas, can have serious adverse effects such as psychosis or valvular heart disease.

  • Aripiprazole is a well-tolerated atypical antipsychotic that, unlike other antipsychotics, is a partial dopamine agonist capable of suppressing prolactin levels.

  • Adjunctive, low-dose aripiprazole has been utilized to reverse risperidone-induced hyperprolactinemia.

  • This case report demonstrates how aripiprazole monotherapy, in doses ranging from 2 to 10 mg/day, was effective in suppressing prolactin in a woman with a microprolactinoma who developed psychiatric side effects from cabergoline.

Open access
Anita Kuriya Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Center, 687 Pine Avenue West F 6.58, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1

Search for other papers by Anita Kuriya in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
David V Morris Division of Endocrinology, McGill University Health Center, 687 Pine Avenue West F 6.58, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1

Search for other papers by David V Morris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Michael H Dahan Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, McGill University Health Center, 687 Pine Avenue West F 6.58, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1A1

Search for other papers by Michael H Dahan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

Cerebral vascular accidents are caused by vasospasm when induced by preeclampsia or by dopamine agonists. However, six arteries nourish the pituitary and prevent against vasospasm-induced damage, which up until now has not been thought to occur. Bromocriptine was used to arrest lactation in a 31-year-old with secondary amenorrhea following preeclampsia and fetal demise at 28 weeks gestation. Tests and history revealed panhypopituitarism not associated with hemorrhage or mass infarction but instead caused by vasospasm. The present study is the first report of pituitary damage from a non-hemorrhagic, vaso-occlusive event in the literature. In keeping with Sheehan's and Simon's syndromes, we have named pituitary damage resulting from vaso-occlusion as Dahan's syndrome, and a literature review suggests that it may be a common and previously overlooked disorder.

Learning points

  • Vasospasm can cause damage to the pituitary gland, although it was not previously believed to do so.

  • Preeclampsia and the use of a dopamine agonist, particularly in the peripartum state, may trigger vasospasm.

  • Vasospasm resulting from dopamine agonists may be a common cause of injury to the pituitary gland, and it may have been overlooked in the past.

Open access
J K Prague Department of Endocrinology, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK

Search for other papers by J K Prague in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
C L Ward Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK

Search for other papers by C L Ward in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
O G Mustafa Department of Endocrinology, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK

Search for other papers by O G Mustafa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
B C Whitelaw Department of Endocrinology, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK

Search for other papers by B C Whitelaw in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
A King Department of Clinical Neuropathology, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK

Search for other papers by A King in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
N W Thomas Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK

Search for other papers by N W Thomas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
J Gilbert Department of Endocrinology, King's College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK

Search for other papers by J Gilbert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

Therapeutic shrinkage of prolactinomas with dopamine agonists achieves clinical benefit but can expose fistulae that have arisen as a result of bony erosion of the sella floor and anterior skull base by the invasive tumour, resulting in the potential development of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhoea, meningitis, and rarely pneumocephalus. Onset of symptoms is typically within 4 months of commencing therapy. The management is typically surgical repair via an endoscopic transnasal transsphenoidal approach. A 23-year-old man presented to the Emergency Department with acute left limb weakness and intermittent headaches. Visual fields were full to confrontation. Immediate computed tomography and subsequent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), demonstrated a 5 cm lobular/cystic mass invading the right cavernous sinus, displacing and compressing the midbrain, with destruction of the bony sella. He was referred to the regional pituitary multidisciplinary team (MDT). Serum prolactin was 159 455 mIU/l (7514.37 ng/ml) (normal ranges 100–410 mIU/l (4.72–19.34 ng/ml)). Cabergoline was commenced causing dramatic reduction in tumour size and resolution of neurological symptoms. Further dose titrations were required as the prolactin level plateaued and significant residual tumour remained. After 13 months of treatment, he developed continuous daily rhinorrhea, and on presenting to his general practitioner was referred to an otolaryngologist. When next seen in the routine regional pituitary clinic six-months later he was admitted for urgent surgical repair. Histology confirmed a prolactinoma with a low proliferation index of 2% (Ki-67 antibody). In view of partial cabergoline resistance he completed a course of conventional radiotherapy. Nine months after treatment the serum prolactin had fallen to 621 mIU/l, and 12 months after an MRI showed reduced tumour volume.

Learning points

  • CSF rhinorrhoea occurred 13 months after the initiation of cabergoline, suggesting a need for vigilance throughout therapy.

  • Dedicated bony imaging should be reviewed early in the patient pathway to assess the potential risk of CSF rhinorrhoea after initiation of dopamine agonist therapy.

  • There was a significant delay before this complication was brought to the attention of the regional pituitary MDT, with associated risk whilst left untreated. This demonstrates a need for patients and healthcare professionals to be educated about early recognition and management of this complication to facilitate timely and appropriate referral to the MDT for specialist advice and management. We changed our nurse-led patient education programme as a result of this case.

  • Having developed partial cabergoline resistance and CSF rhinorrhoea, an excellent therapeutic response was achieved with conventional radiotherapy after limited surgery.

Open access