Diagnosis and Treatment > Medication
Search for other papers by Anna Popławska-Kita in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marta Wielogórska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Łukasz Poplawski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Katarzyna Siewko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Agnieszka Adamska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Piotr Szumowski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Piotr Myśliwiec in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Janusz Myśliwiec in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joanna Reszeć in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Grzegorz Kamiński in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Janusz Dzięcioł in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dorota Tobiaszewska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Małgorzata Szelachowska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Adam Jacek Krętowski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Papillary thyroid gland carcinoma is the most common type of malignancy of the endocrine system. Metastases to the pituitary gland have been described as a complication of papillary thyroid cancer in few reported cases since 1965. We report the case of a 68-year-old female patient with a well-differentiated form of thyroid gland cancer. Despite it being the most common malignant cancer of the endocrine system, with its papillary form being one of the two most frequently diagnosed thyroid cancers, the case we present is extremely rare. Sudden cardiac arrest during ventricular fibrillation occurred during hospitalization. Autopsy of the patient revealed papillary carcinoma of the thyroid, follicular variant, with metastasis to the sella turcica, and concomitant sarcoidosis of heart, lung, and mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. Not only does atypical metastasis make our patient’s case most remarkable, but also the postmortem diagnosis of sarcoidosis makes her case particularly unusual.
Learning points:
-
The goal of presenting this case is to raise awareness of the clinical heterogeneity of papillary cancer and promote early diagnosis of unexpected metastasis and coexisting diseases to improve clinical outcomes.
-
Clinicians must be skeptical. They should not fall into the trap of diagnostic momentum or accept diagnostic labels at face value. Regardless of the potential mechanisms, clinicians should be aware of the possibility of the coexistence of thyroid cancer and sarcoidosis as a differential diagnosis of lymphadenopathy.
-
This case highlights the importance of the diagnostic and therapeutic planning process and raises awareness of the fact that one uncommon disease could be masked by another extremely rare disorder.
National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
Search for other papers by Michelle Maher in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Federico Roncaroli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nigel Mendoza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Karim Meeran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Natalie Canham in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Monika Kosicka-Slawinska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Birgitta Bernhard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David Collier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Juliana Drummond in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kassiani Skordilis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicola Tufton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anastasia Gontsarova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Niamh Martin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Márta Korbonits in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Florian Wernig in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Symptomatic pituitary adenomas occur with a prevalence of approximately 0.1% in the general population. It is estimated that 5% of pituitary adenomas occur in a familial setting, either in isolated or syndromic form. Recently, loss-of-function mutations in genes encoding succinate dehydrogenase subunits (SDHx) or MYC-associated factor X (MAX) have been found to predispose to pituitary adenomas in co-existence with paragangliomas or phaeochromocytomas. It is rare, however, for a familial SDHx mutation to manifest as an isolated pituitary adenoma. We present the case of a pituitary lactotroph adenoma in a patient with a heterozygous germline SDHB mutation, in the absence of concomitant neoplasms. Initially, the adenoma showed biochemical response but poor tumour shrinkage in response to cabergoline; therefore, transsphenoidal surgery was performed. Following initial clinical improvement, tumour recurrence was identified 15 months later. Interestingly, re-initiation of cabergoline proved successful and the lesion demonstrated both biochemical response and tumour shrinkage. Our patient’s SDHB mutation was identified when we realised that her father had a metastatic paraganglioma, prompting genetic testing. Re-inspection of the histopathological report of the prolactinoma confirmed cells with vacuolated cytoplasm. This histological feature is suggestive of an SDHx mutation and should prompt further screening for mutations by immunohistochemistry and/or genetic testing. Surprisingly, immunohistochemistry of this pituitary adenoma demonstrated normal SDHB expression, despite loss of SDHB expression in the patient’s father’s paraganglioma.
Learning points:
-
Pituitary adenomas may be the presenting and/or sole feature of SDHB mutation-related disease.
-
SDHx mutated pituitary adenomas may display clinically aggressive behaviour and demonstrate variable response to medical treatment.
-
Histological evidence of intracytoplasmic vacuoles in a pituitary adenoma might suggest an SDH-deficient tumour and should prompt further screening for SDHx mutations.
-
Immunohistochemistry may not always predict the presence of SDHx mutations.
Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
Institute for Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Search for other papers by Anne de Bray in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
Search for other papers by Zaki K Hassan-Smith in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
Search for other papers by Jamal Dirie in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Edward Littleton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Swarupsinh Chavda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
Search for other papers by John Ayuk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paul Sanghera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
Institute for Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
Search for other papers by Niki Karavitaki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
A 48-year-old man was diagnosed with a large macroprolactinoma in 1982 treated with surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy and bromocriptine. Normal prolactin was achieved in 2005 but in 2009 it started rising. Pituitary MRIs in 2009, 2012, 2014 and 2015 were reported as showing empty pituitary fossa. Prolactin continued to increase (despite increasing bromocriptine dose). Trialling cabergoline had no effect (prolactin 191,380 mU/L). In January 2016, he presented with right facial weakness and CT head was reported as showing no acute intracranial abnormality. In late 2016, he was referred to ENT with hoarse voice; left hypoglossal and recurrent laryngeal nerve palsies were found. At this point, prolactin was 534,176 mU/L. Just before further endocrine review, he had a fall and CT head showed a basal skull mass invading the left petrous temporal bone. Pituitary MRI revealed a large enhancing mass within the sella infiltrating the clivus, extending into the left petrous apex and occipital condyle with involvement of the left Meckel’s cave, internal acoustic meatus, jugular foramen and hypoglossal canal. At that time, left abducens nerve palsy was also present. CT thorax/abdomen/pelvis excluded malignancy. Review of previous images suggested that this lesion had started becoming evident below the fossa in pituitary MRI of 2015. Temozolomide was initiated. After eight cycles, there is significant tumour reduction with prolactin 1565 mU/L and cranial nerve deficits have remained stable. Prolactinomas can manifest aggressive behaviour even decades after initial treatment highlighting the unpredictable clinical course they can demonstrate and the need for careful imaging review.
Learning points:
-
Aggressive behaviour of prolactinomas can manifest even decades after first treatment highlighting the unpredictable clinical course these tumours can demonstrate.
-
Escape from control of hyperprolactinaemia in the absence of sellar adenomatous tissue requires careful and systematic search for the anatomical localisation of the lesion responsible for the prolactin excess.
-
Temozolomide is a valuable agent in the therapeutic armamentarium for aggressive/invasive prolactinomas, particularly if they are not amenable to other treatment modalities.
Fundacion de Endocrinologia
Search for other papers by Oscar D Bruno in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ricardo Fernández Pisani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Gabriel Isaac in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Armando Basso in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
The role of mechanical forces influencing the growth of a pituitary adenoma is poorly understood. In this paper we report the case of a young man with hyperprolactinaemia and an empty sella secondary to hydrocephalia, who developed a macroprolactinoma following the relief of high intraventricular pressure.
Learning points:
-
The volume of a pituitary tumour may be influenced not only by molecular but also by local mechanical factors.
-
Intratumoural pressure, resistance of the sellar diaphragm and intracranial liquid pressure may play a role in the final size of a pituitary adenoma.
-
The presence of hydrocephalus may hide a pituitary macroadenoma.
Search for other papers by Nikolaos Kyriakakis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jacqueline Trouillas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mary N Dang in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Julie Lynch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Paul Belchetz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Márta Korbonits in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Robert D Murray in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
A male patient presented at the age of 30 with classic clinical features of acromegaly and was found to have elevated growth hormone levels, not suppressing during an oral glucose tolerance test. His acromegaly was originally considered to be of pituitary origin, based on a CT scan, which was interpreted as showing a pituitary macroadenoma. Despite two trans-sphenoidal surgeries, cranial radiotherapy and periods of treatment with bromocriptine and octreotide, his acromegaly remained active clinically and biochemically. A lung mass was discovered incidentally on a chest X-ray performed as part of a routine pre-assessment for spinal surgery 5 years following the initial presentation. This was confirmed to be a bronchial carcinoid tumour, which was strongly positive for growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin receptor type 2 by immunohistochemistry. The re-examination of the pituitary specimens asserted the diagnosis of pituitary GH hyperplasia. Complete resolution of the patient’s acromegaly was achieved following right lower and middle lobectomy. Seventeen years following the successful resection of the bronchial carcinoid tumour the patient remains under annual endocrine follow-up for monitoring of the hypopituitarism he developed after the original interventions to his pituitary gland, while there has been no evidence of active acromegaly or recurrence of the carcinoid tumour. Ectopic acromegaly is extremely rare, accounting for <1% of all cases of acromegaly. Our case highlights the diagnostic challenges differentiating between ectopic acromegaly and acromegaly of pituitary origin and emphasises the importance of avoiding unnecessary pituitary surgery and radiotherapy. The role of laboratory investigations, imaging and histology as diagnostic tools is discussed.
Learning points:
-
Ectopic acromegaly is rare, accounting for less than 1% of all cases of acromegaly.
-
Ectopic acromegaly is almost always due to extra-pituitary GHRH secretion, mainly from neuroendocrine tumours of pancreatic or bronchial origin.
-
Differentiating between acromegaly of pituitary origin and ectopic acromegaly can cause diagnostic challenges due to similarities in clinical presentation and biochemistry.
-
Serum GHRH can be a useful diagnostic tool to diagnose ectopic acromegaly.
-
Pituitary imaging is crucial to differentiate between a pituitary adenoma and pituitary hyperplasia, which is a common finding in ectopic acromegaly.
-
Diagnosing ectopic acromegaly is pivotal to avoid unnecessary interventions to the pituitary and preserve normal pituitary function.
Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Search for other papers by Emilia Sbardella in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by George Farah in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ahmed Fathelrahman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simon Cudlip in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Olaf Ansorge in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Niki Karavitaki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ashley B Grossman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Pituitary adenomas are a common intracranial neoplasm, usually demonstrating a benign phenotype. They can be classified according to pathological, radiological or clinical behaviour as typical, atypical or carcinomas, invasive or noninvasive, and aggressive or nonaggressive. Prolactinomas account for 40–60% of all pituitary adenomas, with dopamine agonists representing the first-line treatment and surgery/radiotherapy reserved for drug intolerance/resistance or in neuro-ophthalmological emergencies. We present the case of a 62-year-old man with an apparently indolent prolactin-secreting macroadenoma managed with partial resection and initially showing a biochemical response to cabergoline. Five years later, the tumour became resistant to cabergoline, despite a substantial increase in dosage, showing rapid growth and causing worsening of vision. The patient then underwent two further transsphenoidal operations and continued on high-dose cabergoline; despite these interventions, the tumour continued enlarging and prolactin increased to 107 269 U/L. Histology of the third surgical specimen demonstrated features of aggressive behaviour (atypical adenoma with a high cell proliferation index) not present in the tumour removed at the first operation. Subsequently, he was referred for radiotherapy aiming to control tumour growth.
Learning points:
-
The development of secondary resistance to dopamine agonists (DAs) is a serious sign as it may be associated with de-differentiation of the prolactinoma and thus of aggressive or malignant transformation.
-
Significant de-differentiation of the adenoma documented on consecutive histologies suggests a possible transition to malignancy.
-
A combination of histological ‘alarm’ features associated with persistent growth and escape from DAs treatment in recurrent adenomas should alert clinicians and demands close follow-up.
-
A multidisciplinary approach by pathologists, endocrinologists and neurosurgeons is essential.
Search for other papers by Niki Margari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jonathan Pollock in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nemanja Stojanovic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Prolactinomas constitute the largest subsection of all secretory pituitary adenomas. Most are microprolactinomas and are satisfactorily treated by medical management alone. Giant prolactinomas, measuring more than 4 cm in diameter, are rare and usually occur more commonly in men. Macroprolatinomas tend to present with symptoms of mass effect rather than those of hyperprolactinaemia. Dopamine agonists (DA) are the treatment of choice for all prolactinomas. Surgery is usually reserved for DA resistance or if vision is threatened by the mass effects of the tumour. We describe the case of a 52 year-old woman with a giant invasive prolactinoma who required multiple surgical procedures as well as medical management with DA. One of the surgical interventions required a posterior approach via the trans cranial sub occipital transtentorial approach, a surgical technique that has not been previously described in the medical literature for this indication. The giant prolactinoma was reduced significantly with the above approach and patient symptoms from the compressing effects of the tumour were resolved. This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the management of such patients who present with florid neurological sequelae secondary to pressure effects. Although this presentation is uncommon, surgery via a sub occipital transtentorial approach may be considered the treatment of choice in suitable patients with giant invasive prolactinomas compressing the brainstem.
Learning points
-
Giant prolactinomas present with symptoms of mass effect or those of hyperprolactinaemia.
-
Interpretation of the pituitary profile is crucial to guide further investigations and management.
-
Treatment of giant invasive prolactinomas may involve a combination of medical management and multiple surgical interventions.
-
Treatment with DA may cause pituitary haemorrhage or infarction in patients with these tumours.
-
A sub occipital transtetorial approach may be considered the treatment of choice in invasive prolactinomas compressing the brainstem.
-
Multidisciplinary approach of such patients is fundamental for a better outcome.
Search for other papers by Niki Margari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simon Page in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
A 56-year-old man was brought to the Emergency Department after being found collapsed at his office with a reduced level of consciousness. From clinical examination and initial investigations, he was diagnosed as having bacterial meningitis and was promptly commenced on empirical i.v. antibiotics. Computed tomography of the brain revealed a parenchymal mass at the base of the skull and subsequent magnetic resonance imaging of the head 4 days later confirmed a large soft tissue mass, which extended through to the cavernous sinus. Examination of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) following lumbar puncture confirmed pneumococcal meningitis and antibiotics were continued for 2 weeks in total. During the admission, hormone profiling revealed a grossly elevated prolactin. When coupled with the initial results of the brain imaging, this result helped to confirm a macroprolactinoma that was invading the postnasal space. A final diagnosis of pneumococcal meningitis secondary to invading prolactinoma was made. The patient was started on cabergoline and was followed up in the outpatient clinic upon discharge. He made a full recovery from the meningitis. Over the next few months, prolactin levels returned to be normal and the prolactinoma shrank significantly in size. The patient remains on cabergoline that will most likely be continued indefinitely.
Learning points
-
Bacterial meningitis is a rare first presentation of pituitary macroprolactinoma.
-
Patients with invasive macroprolactinoma do not always present with CSF leakage.
-
Prompt treatment with antibiotics and a dopamine agonist is of great importance for a favourable outcome.
-
Close monitoring of the patient for signs of raised intracranial pressure is essential in the management of macroprolactinoma.
-
Note the risk of CSF leakage after initiation of dopamine agonist therapy irrespective of concomitant meningitis in macroprolactinoma.
Search for other papers by Satoru Sakihara in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kazunori Kageyama in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Satoshi Yamagata in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ken Terui in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Makoto Daimon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Toshihiro Suda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome includes Cushing's disease and ectopic ACTH syndrome (EAS). The differential diagnosis of Cushing's disease from EAS in cases of ACTH-dependent Cushing's syndrome is a challenging problem. We report here a case of EAS with an unknown source of ACTH secretion. Extensive imaging procedures, involving computed tomography (neck to pelvis), pituitary magnetic resonance imaging, and whole-body 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography, failed to reveal the source of ACTH secretion. Intermittent administration of bromocriptine, a short-acting and nonselective dopamine agonist, has afforded adequate suppression of plasma ACTH and cortisol levels over the long term.
Learning points
-
Tumor excision is the primary treatment for EAS. However, when surgery is impossible, medical therapy is needed to treat hypercortisolism.
-
In cases where the source of ACTH secretion is unknown, inhibitors of steroidogenesis, such as metyrapone, mitotane, ketoconazole, and etomidate, are mostly used to suppress cortisol secretion.
-
Medications that suppress ACTH secretion are less effective, therefore less popular, as standard treatments.
-
In the present case, short-term treatment with dopamine agonists was effective for the long-term suppression of both ACTH and cortisol levels.
