Diagnosis and Treatment > Medication
Search for other papers by G Leksic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A M Alduk in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by V Molnar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Haxhiu in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by A Balasko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by N Knezevic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by T Dusek in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by D Kastelan in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Primary aldosteronism (PA) is characterised by aldosterone hypersecretion and represents a common cause of secondary hypertension. During diagnostic evaluation, it is essential to determine the aetiology of PA since the treatment of unilateral and bilateral disease differs significantly. Adrenal vein sampling (AVS) has been implemented as a gold standard test for the diagnosis of PA subtype. However, due to the AVS complexity, costs and limited availability, many patients with PA are being treated based on the computed tomography (CT) findings. In this article, we present two patients with discrepant CT and AVS results, demonstrating that AVS is the only reliable method for localising the source of aldosterone excess.
Learning points:
-
CT is an unreliable method for distinguishing aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) from bilateral adrenal hyperplasia (BAH).
-
CT can be misleading in defining lateralisation of the aldosterone excess in case of unilateral disease (APA).
-
AVS is the gold standard test for defining the PA subtype.
Search for other papers by Michal Barabas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Isabel Huang-Doran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Debbie Pitfield in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Hazel Philips in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Manoj Goonewardene in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ruth T Casey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
IMED Biotech Unit, Clinical Discovery Unit, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK
Search for other papers by Benjamin G Challis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
A 67-year-old woman presented with a generalised rash associated with weight loss and resting tachycardia. She had a recent diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Biochemical evaluation revealed elevated levels of circulating glucagon and chromogranin B. Cross-sectional imaging demonstrated a pancreatic lesion and liver metastases, which were octreotide-avid. Biopsy of the liver lesion confirmed a diagnosis of well-differentiated grade 2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour, consistent with metastatic glucagonoma. Serial echocardiography commenced 4 years before this diagnosis demonstrated a progressive left ventricular dilatation and dysfunction in the absence of ischaemia, suggestive of glucagonoma-associated dilated cardiomyopathy. Given the severity of the cardiac impairment, surgical management was considered inappropriate and somatostatin analogue therapy was initiated, affecting clinical and biochemical improvement. Serial cross-sectional imaging demonstrated stable disease 2 years after diagnosis. Left ventricular dysfunction persisted, however, despite somatostatin analogue therapy and optimal medical management of cardiac failure. In contrast to previous reports, the case we describe demonstrates that chronic hyperglucagonaemia may lead to irreversible left ventricular compromise. Management of glucagonoma therefore requires careful and serial evaluation of cardiac status.
Learning points:
-
In rare cases, glucagonoma may present with cardiac failure as the dominant feature. Significant cardiac impairment may occur in the absence of other features of glucagonoma syndrome due to subclinical chronic hyperglucagonaemia.
-
A diagnosis of glucagonoma should be considered in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, particularly those with other features of glucagonoma syndrome.
-
Cardiac impairment due to glucagonoma may not respond to somatostatin analogue therapy, even in the context of biochemical improvement.
-
All patients with a new diagnosis of glucagonoma should be assessed clinically for evidence of cardiac failure and, if present, a baseline transthoracic echocardiogram should be performed. In the presence of cardiac impairment these patients should be managed by an experienced cardiologist.
