Diagnosis and Treatment > Medication
Search for other papers by Impana Shetty in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sarah Fuller in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Margarita Raygada in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria J Merino in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by B J Thomas in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Brigitte C Widemann in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Karlyne M Reilly in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Karel Pacak in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jaydira Del Rivero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is an aggressive cancer that originates in the cortex of the adrenal gland and generally has a poor prognosis. ACC is rare but can be more commonly seen in those with cancer predisposition syndromes (e.g. Li-Fraumeni and Lynch Syndrome). The diagnosis of ACC is sometimes uncertain and it requires the use of precise molecular pathology; the differential diagnosis includes pheochromocytoma, adrenal adenoma, renal carcinoma, or hepatocellular carcinoma. We describe a case of a 57-year-old woman with Lynch Syndrome and metastatic ACC who was initially diagnosed as having pheochromocytoma. The tumor was first identified at 51 years of age by ultrasound followed by a CT scan. She underwent a left adrenalectomy, and the histopathology identified pheochromocytoma. Two years later, she had tumor recurrence with imaging studies showing multiple lung nodules. Following a wedge resection by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), histopathology was read as metastatic pheochromocytoma at one institution and metastatic ACC at another institution. She later presented to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) where the diagnosis of ACC was confirmed. Following her ACC diagnosis, she was treated with mitotane and pembrolizumab which were stopped due to side effects and progression of disease. She is currently receiving etoposide, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (EDP). This case highlights the importance of using a multi-disciplinary approach in patient care. Thorough evaluation of the tumor’s pathology and analysis of the patient’s genetic profile are necessary to obtain the correct diagnosis for the patient and can significantly influence the course of treatment.
Learning points:
-
Making the diagnosis of ACC can be difficult as the differential diagnosis includes pheochromocytoma, adrenal adenoma, renal carcinoma, or hepatocellular carcinoma.
-
Patients with Lynch Syndrome should undergo surveillance for ACC as there is evidence of an association between Lynch Syndrome and ACC.
-
Conducting a complete tumor immunoprofile and obtaining a second opinion is very important in cases of suspected ACC in order to confirm the proper diagnosis.
-
A multi-disciplinary approach including genetic testing and a thorough evaluation of the tumor’s pathology is imperative to ensuring that the patient receives an accurate diagnosis and the appropriate treatment.
Search for other papers by Angelo Paci in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
Search for other papers by Ségolène Hescot in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Atmane Seck in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Christel Jublanc in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lionel Mercier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Delphine Vezzosi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Delphine Drui in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marcus Quinkler in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Martin Fassnacht in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eric Bruckert in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marc Lombès in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sophie Leboulleux in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sophie Broutin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology Department, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
Search for other papers by Eric Baudin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Mitotane (o,p′-DDD) is the standard treatment for advanced adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC). Monitoring of plasma mitotane levels is recommended to look for a therapeutic window between 14 and 20mg/L, but its positive predictive value requires optimization. We report the case of an ACC patient with a history of dyslipidemia treated with mitotane in whom several plasma mitotane levels >30mg/L were found together with an excellent neurological tolerance. This observation led us to compare theoretical or measured o,p′-DDD and o,p′-DDE levels in a series of normolipidemic and dyslipidemic plasma samples to explore potential analytical issues responsible for an overestimation of plasma mitotane levels. We demonstrate an overestimation of mitotane measurements in dyslipidemic patients. Mitotane and o,p′-DDE measurements showed a mean 20% overestimation in hypercholesterolemic and hypertriglyceridemic plasma, compared with normolipidemic plasma. The internal standard p,p′-DDE measurements showed a parallel decrease in hypercholesterolemic and hypertriglyceridemic plasma, suggesting a matrix effect. Finally, diluting plasma samples and/or using phospholipid removal cartridges allowed correcting such interference.
Learning points
-
Hypercholesterolemia (HCH) and hypertriglyceridemia (HTG) induce an overestimation of plasma mitotane measurements.
-
We propose a routine monitoring of lipidemic status.
-
We propose optimized methodology of measurement before interpreting high plasma mitotane levels.
