Diagnosis and Treatment > Signs and Symptoms
Search for other papers by Melissa Katz in
Google Scholar
PubMed
School of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
Search for other papers by Simon Smith in
Google Scholar
PubMed
School of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
Search for other papers by Luke Conway in
Google Scholar
PubMed
School of Medicine and Dentistry, James Cook University, Cairns, Queensland, Australia
Search for other papers by Ashim Sinha in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Diabetes mellitus is a well-recognised risk factor for melioidosis, the disease caused by Burkholderia pseudomallei, which is endemic in northern Australia and Southeast Asia. We present the initial diagnostic dilemma of a febrile patient from northern Australia with type 1 diabetes mellitus and negative blood cultures. After a 6-week history of fevers and undifferentiated abdominal pain, MRI of her spine revealed a psoas abscess. She underwent drainage of the abscess which cultured B. pseudomallei. She completed 6 weeks of intravenous (IV) ceftazidime and oral trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) followed by a 12-week course of oral TMP/SMX. We postulate that the likely route of infection was inoculation via her skin, the integrity of which was compromised from her insulin pump insertion sites and an underlying dermatological condition.
Learning points:
-
Diabetes mellitus is the strongest risk factor for developing melioidosis.
-
Atypical infections need to be considered in individuals with diabetes mellitus who are febrile, even if blood cultures are negative.
-
There is heterogeneity in the clinical presentation of melioidosis due to variable organ involvement.
-
Consider melioidosis in febrile patients who have travelled to northern Australia, Asia and other endemic areas.
Search for other papers by Prashanth Rawla in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anantha R Vellipuram in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sathyajit S Bandaru in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jeffrey Pradeep Raj in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis (EDKA) is a clinical triad comprising increased anion gap metabolic acidosis, ketonemia or ketonuria and normal blood glucose levels <200 mg/dL. This condition is a diagnostic challenge as euglycemia masquerades the underlying diabetic ketoacidosis. Thus, a high clinical suspicion is warranted, and other diagnosis ruled out. Here, we present two patients on regular insulin treatment who were admitted with a diagnosis of EDKA. The first patient had insulin pump failure and the second patient had urinary tract infection and nausea, thereby resulting in starvation. Both of them were aggressively treated with intravenous fluids and insulin drip as per the protocol for the blood glucose levels till the anion gap normalized, and the metabolic acidosis reversed. This case series summarizes, in brief, the etiology, pathophysiology and treatment of EDKA.
Learning points:
-
Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis is rare.
-
Consider ketosis in patients with DKA even if their serum glucose levels are normal.
-
High clinical suspicion is required to diagnose EDKA as normal blood sugar levels masquerade the underlying DKA and cause a diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma.
-
Blood pH and blood or urine ketones should be checked in ill patients with diabetes regardless of blood glucose levels.
