Diagnosis and Treatment > Signs and Symptoms

You are looking at 1 - 2 of 2 items for :

  • Hyperprolactinaemia x
Clear All
Benedetta Zampetti Endocrinology Unit, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Benedetta Zampetti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Giorgia Simonetti Neurooncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Neurological Institute Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Giorgia Simonetti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Roberto Attanasio Endocrinology Service, Galeazzi Institute IRCCS, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Roberto Attanasio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Antonio Silvani Neurooncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Neurological Institute Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Antonio Silvani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Renato Cozzi Endocrinology Unit, Niguarda Hospital, Milan, Italy

Search for other papers by Renato Cozzi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

We describe the 20-year course of a 63-year-old male with a macroprolactinoma that acquired resistance to treatment and aggressive behavior after a 4-year successful treatment with cabergoline. He was submitted to multiple surgical resections by a skilled surgeon, fractionated radiotherapy and was eventually treated with temozolomide. After a first 6-month standard cycle, a relapse occurred and he was treated again successfully.

Learning points:

  • Prolactinomas are the most frequent type of pituitary adenoma.

  • They usually have a benign course.

  • In most cases dopamine-agonist drugs, mainly cabergoline, are first-line (and usually only) treatment.

  • Occasionally prolactinomas can have or acquire resistance to treatment and/or aggressive behavior.

  • Temozolomide (TMZ), an oral alkylating drug, can be effective in such aggressive tumors.

  • Multimodal treatment (surgery, radiation, cabergoline and TMZ) is warranted in aggressive pituitary tumors.

  • We describe here successful rechallenge with TMZ after relapse occurring 18 months after a first TMZ cycle.

Open access
Michelle Maher Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland

Search for other papers by Michelle Maher in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Federico Roncaroli University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

Search for other papers by Federico Roncaroli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Nigel Mendoza Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Nigel Mendoza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Karim Meeran Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Karim Meeran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Natalie Canham Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK

Search for other papers by Natalie Canham in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Monika Kosicka-Slawinska London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Monika Kosicka-Slawinska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Birgitta Bernhard London North West Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Birgitta Bernhard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
David Collier The William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for other papers by David Collier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Juliana Drummond The William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for other papers by Juliana Drummond in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kassiani Skordilis University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Mindelsohn Way, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK

Search for other papers by Kassiani Skordilis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Nicola Tufton The Royal London Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London UK

Search for other papers by Nicola Tufton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Anastasia Gontsarova Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Anastasia Gontsarova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Niamh Martin Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Niamh Martin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Márta Korbonits The William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

Search for other papers by Márta Korbonits in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Florian Wernig Endocrinology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK

Search for other papers by Florian Wernig in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

Symptomatic pituitary adenomas occur with a prevalence of approximately 0.1% in the general population. It is estimated that 5% of pituitary adenomas occur in a familial setting, either in isolated or syndromic form. Recently, loss-of-function mutations in genes encoding succinate dehydrogenase subunits (SDHx) or MYC-associated factor X (MAX) have been found to predispose to pituitary adenomas in co-existence with paragangliomas or phaeochromocytomas. It is rare, however, for a familial SDHx mutation to manifest as an isolated pituitary adenoma. We present the case of a pituitary lactotroph adenoma in a patient with a heterozygous germline SDHB mutation, in the absence of concomitant neoplasms. Initially, the adenoma showed biochemical response but poor tumour shrinkage in response to cabergoline; therefore, transsphenoidal surgery was performed. Following initial clinical improvement, tumour recurrence was identified 15 months later. Interestingly, re-initiation of cabergoline proved successful and the lesion demonstrated both biochemical response and tumour shrinkage. Our patient’s SDHB mutation was identified when we realised that her father had a metastatic paraganglioma, prompting genetic testing. Re-inspection of the histopathological report of the prolactinoma confirmed cells with vacuolated cytoplasm. This histological feature is suggestive of an SDHx mutation and should prompt further screening for mutations by immunohistochemistry and/or genetic testing. Surprisingly, immunohistochemistry of this pituitary adenoma demonstrated normal SDHB expression, despite loss of SDHB expression in the patient’s father’s paraganglioma.

Learning points:

  • Pituitary adenomas may be the presenting and/or sole feature of SDHB mutation-related disease.

  • SDHx mutated pituitary adenomas may display clinically aggressive behaviour and demonstrate variable response to medical treatment.

  • Histological evidence of intracytoplasmic vacuoles in a pituitary adenoma might suggest an SDH-deficient tumour and should prompt further screening for SDHx mutations.

  • Immunohistochemistry may not always predict the presence of SDHx mutations.

Open access