Diagnosis and Treatment > Signs and Symptoms
Search for other papers by Anna Popławska-Kita in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Marta Wielogórska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Łukasz Poplawski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Katarzyna Siewko in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Agnieszka Adamska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Piotr Szumowski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Piotr Myśliwiec in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Janusz Myśliwiec in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Joanna Reszeć in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Grzegorz Kamiński in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Janusz Dzięcioł in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Dorota Tobiaszewska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Małgorzata Szelachowska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Adam Jacek Krętowski in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Papillary thyroid gland carcinoma is the most common type of malignancy of the endocrine system. Metastases to the pituitary gland have been described as a complication of papillary thyroid cancer in few reported cases since 1965. We report the case of a 68-year-old female patient with a well-differentiated form of thyroid gland cancer. Despite it being the most common malignant cancer of the endocrine system, with its papillary form being one of the two most frequently diagnosed thyroid cancers, the case we present is extremely rare. Sudden cardiac arrest during ventricular fibrillation occurred during hospitalization. Autopsy of the patient revealed papillary carcinoma of the thyroid, follicular variant, with metastasis to the sella turcica, and concomitant sarcoidosis of heart, lung, and mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. Not only does atypical metastasis make our patient’s case most remarkable, but also the postmortem diagnosis of sarcoidosis makes her case particularly unusual.
Learning points:
-
The goal of presenting this case is to raise awareness of the clinical heterogeneity of papillary cancer and promote early diagnosis of unexpected metastasis and coexisting diseases to improve clinical outcomes.
-
Clinicians must be skeptical. They should not fall into the trap of diagnostic momentum or accept diagnostic labels at face value. Regardless of the potential mechanisms, clinicians should be aware of the possibility of the coexistence of thyroid cancer and sarcoidosis as a differential diagnosis of lymphadenopathy.
-
This case highlights the importance of the diagnostic and therapeutic planning process and raises awareness of the fact that one uncommon disease could be masked by another extremely rare disorder.
National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
Search for other papers by Michelle Maher in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Federico Roncaroli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nigel Mendoza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Karim Meeran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Natalie Canham in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Monika Kosicka-Slawinska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Birgitta Bernhard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David Collier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Juliana Drummond in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kassiani Skordilis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicola Tufton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anastasia Gontsarova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Niamh Martin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Márta Korbonits in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Florian Wernig in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Symptomatic pituitary adenomas occur with a prevalence of approximately 0.1% in the general population. It is estimated that 5% of pituitary adenomas occur in a familial setting, either in isolated or syndromic form. Recently, loss-of-function mutations in genes encoding succinate dehydrogenase subunits (SDHx) or MYC-associated factor X (MAX) have been found to predispose to pituitary adenomas in co-existence with paragangliomas or phaeochromocytomas. It is rare, however, for a familial SDHx mutation to manifest as an isolated pituitary adenoma. We present the case of a pituitary lactotroph adenoma in a patient with a heterozygous germline SDHB mutation, in the absence of concomitant neoplasms. Initially, the adenoma showed biochemical response but poor tumour shrinkage in response to cabergoline; therefore, transsphenoidal surgery was performed. Following initial clinical improvement, tumour recurrence was identified 15 months later. Interestingly, re-initiation of cabergoline proved successful and the lesion demonstrated both biochemical response and tumour shrinkage. Our patient’s SDHB mutation was identified when we realised that her father had a metastatic paraganglioma, prompting genetic testing. Re-inspection of the histopathological report of the prolactinoma confirmed cells with vacuolated cytoplasm. This histological feature is suggestive of an SDHx mutation and should prompt further screening for mutations by immunohistochemistry and/or genetic testing. Surprisingly, immunohistochemistry of this pituitary adenoma demonstrated normal SDHB expression, despite loss of SDHB expression in the patient’s father’s paraganglioma.
Learning points:
-
Pituitary adenomas may be the presenting and/or sole feature of SDHB mutation-related disease.
-
SDHx mutated pituitary adenomas may display clinically aggressive behaviour and demonstrate variable response to medical treatment.
-
Histological evidence of intracytoplasmic vacuoles in a pituitary adenoma might suggest an SDH-deficient tumour and should prompt further screening for SDHx mutations.
-
Immunohistochemistry may not always predict the presence of SDHx mutations.
Search for other papers by Ekaterina Manuylova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Laura M Calvi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Catherine Hastings in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by G Edward Vates in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Mahlon D Johnson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by William T Cave Jr in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ismat Shafiq in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Co-secretion of growth hormone (GH) and prolactin (PRL) from a single pituitary adenoma is common. In fact, up to 25% of patients with acromegaly may have PRL co-secretion. The prevalence of acromegaly among patients with a newly diagnosed prolactinoma is unknown. Given the possibility of mixed GH and PRL co-secretion, the current recommendation is to obtain an insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) in patients with prolactinoma at the initial diagnosis. Long-term follow-up of IGF-1 is not routinely done. Here, we report two cases of well-controlled prolactinoma on dopamine agonists with the development of acromegaly 10–20 years after the initial diagnoses. In both patients, a mixed PRL/GH-cosecreting adenoma was confirmed on the pathology examination after transsphenoidal surgery (TSS). Therefore, periodic routine measurements of IGF-1 should be considered regardless of the duration and biochemical control of prolactinoma.
Learning points:
-
Acromegaly can develop in patients with well-controlled prolactinoma on dopamine agonists.
-
The interval between prolactinoma and acromegaly diagnoses can be several decades.
-
Periodic screening of patients with prolactinoma for growth hormone excess should be considered and can lead to an early diagnosis of acromegaly before the development of complications.
Search for other papers by Niki Margari in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Jonathan Pollock in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nemanja Stojanovic in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Prolactinomas constitute the largest subsection of all secretory pituitary adenomas. Most are microprolactinomas and are satisfactorily treated by medical management alone. Giant prolactinomas, measuring more than 4 cm in diameter, are rare and usually occur more commonly in men. Macroprolatinomas tend to present with symptoms of mass effect rather than those of hyperprolactinaemia. Dopamine agonists (DA) are the treatment of choice for all prolactinomas. Surgery is usually reserved for DA resistance or if vision is threatened by the mass effects of the tumour. We describe the case of a 52 year-old woman with a giant invasive prolactinoma who required multiple surgical procedures as well as medical management with DA. One of the surgical interventions required a posterior approach via the trans cranial sub occipital transtentorial approach, a surgical technique that has not been previously described in the medical literature for this indication. The giant prolactinoma was reduced significantly with the above approach and patient symptoms from the compressing effects of the tumour were resolved. This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the management of such patients who present with florid neurological sequelae secondary to pressure effects. Although this presentation is uncommon, surgery via a sub occipital transtentorial approach may be considered the treatment of choice in suitable patients with giant invasive prolactinomas compressing the brainstem.
Learning points
-
Giant prolactinomas present with symptoms of mass effect or those of hyperprolactinaemia.
-
Interpretation of the pituitary profile is crucial to guide further investigations and management.
-
Treatment of giant invasive prolactinomas may involve a combination of medical management and multiple surgical interventions.
-
Treatment with DA may cause pituitary haemorrhage or infarction in patients with these tumours.
-
A sub occipital transtetorial approach may be considered the treatment of choice in invasive prolactinomas compressing the brainstem.
-
Multidisciplinary approach of such patients is fundamental for a better outcome.
