Diagnosis and Treatment > Signs and Symptoms
University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
Search for other papers by Jane J Tellam in
Google Scholar
PubMed
University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
Pathology Queensland, Australia
Search for other papers by Ghusoon Abdulrasool in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia
Search for other papers by Louise C H Ciin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Distinguishing primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) from familial hypocalciuric hypercalcaemia (FHH) can be challenging. Currently, 24-h urinary calcium is used to differentiate between the two conditions in vitamin D replete patients, with urinary calcium creatinine clearance ratio (UCCR) <0.01 suggestive of FHH and >0.02 supportive of PHPT. A 26-year-old Caucasian gentleman presented with recurrent mild hypercalcaemia and inappropriately normal parathyroid hormone (PTH) following previous parathyroidectomy 3 years prior. He had symptoms of fatigue and light-headedness. He did not have any other symptoms of hypercalcaemia. His previous evaluation appeared to be consistent with PHPT as evidenced by hypercalcaemia with inappropriately normal PTH and UCCR of 0.0118 (borderline low using guidelines of >0.01 consistent with PHPT). He underwent parathyroidectomy and three parathyroid glands were removed. His calcium briefly normalised after surgery, but rose again to pre-surgery levels within 3 months. Subsequently, he presented to our centre and repeated investigations showed 24-h urinary calcium of 4.6 mmol/day and UCCR of 0.0081 which prompted assessment for FHH. His calcium-sensing receptor (CASR) gene was sequenced and a rare inactivating variant was detected. This variant was described once previously in the literature. His mother was also confirmed to have mild hypercalcaemia with hypocalciuria and, on further enquiry, had the same CASR variant. The CASR variant was classified as likely pathogenic and is consistent with the diagnosis of FHH. This case highlights the challenges in differentiating FHH from PHPT. Accurate diagnosis is vital to prevent unnecessary surgical intervention in the FHH population and is not always straightforward.
Learning points:
-
Distinguishing FHH from PHPT with co-existing vitamin D deficiency is difficult as this can mimic FHH. Therefore, ensure patients are vitamin D replete prior to performing 24-h urinary calcium collection.
-
Individuals with borderline UCCR could have either FHH or PHPT. Consider performing CASR gene sequencing for UCCR between 0.01 and 0.02.
-
Parathyroid imaging is not required for making the diagnosis of PHPT. It is performed when surgery is considered after confirming the diagnosis of PHPT.
Search for other papers by Carmina Teresa Fuss in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stephanie Burger-Stritt in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Silke Horn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ann-Cathrin Koschker in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kathrin Frey in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Almuth Meyer in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stefanie Hahner in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Standard treatment of hypoparathyroidism consists of supplementation of calcium and vitamin D analogues, which does not fully restore calcium homeostasis. In some patients, hypoparathyroidism is refractory to standard treatment with persistent low serum calcium levels and associated clinical complications. Here, we report on three patients (58-year-old male, 52-year-old female, and 48-year-old female) suffering from severe treatment-refractory postsurgical hypoparathyroidism. Two patients had persistent hypocalcemia despite oral treatment with up to 4 µg calcitriol and up to 4 g calcium per day necessitating additional i.v. administration of calcium gluconate 2–3 times per week, whereas the third patient presented with high frequencies of hypocalcemic and treatment-associated hypercalcemic episodes. S.c. administration of rhPTH (1–34) twice daily (40 µg/day) or rhPTH (1–84) (100 µg/day) only temporarily increased serum calcium levels but did not lead to long-term stabilization. In all three cases, treatment with rhPTH (1–34) as continuous s.c. infusion via insulin pump was initiated. Normalization of serum calcium and serum phosphate levels was observed within 1 week at daily 1–34 parathyroid hormone doses of 15 µg to 29.4 µg. Oral vitamin D and calcium treatment could be stopped or reduced and regular i.v. calcium administration was no more necessary. Ongoing efficacy of this treatment has been documented for up to 7 years so far. Therefore, we conclude that hypoparathyroidism that is refractory to both conventional treatment and s.c. parathyroid hormone (single or twice daily) may be successfully treated with continuous parathyroid hormone administration via insulin pump.
Learning points:
-
Standard treatment of hypoparathyroidism still consists of administration of calcium and active vitamin D.
-
Very few patients with hypoparathyroidism also do not respond sufficiently to standard treatment or administration of s.c. parathyroid hormone once or twice daily.
-
In those cases, continuous s.c. administration of parathyroid hormone via insulin pump may represent a successful treatment alternative.
Search for other papers by Alejandro García-Castaño in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Hospital Universitario Cruces, UPV/EHU, Barakaldo, Spain
Search for other papers by Leire Madariaga in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sharona Azriel in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Hospital Universitario Cruces, UPV/EHU, Barakaldo, Spain
Search for other papers by Gustavo Pérez de Nanclares in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Idoia Martínez de LaPiscina in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Rosa Martínez in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Inés Urrutia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Hospital Universitario Cruces, UPV/EHU, Barakaldo, Spain
Search for other papers by Aníbal Aguayo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Hospital Universitario Cruces, UPV/EHU, Barakaldo, Spain
Search for other papers by Sonia Gaztambide in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Hospital Universitario Cruces, UPV/EHU, Barakaldo, Spain
Search for other papers by Luis Castaño in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type I is an autosomal dominant disorder caused by heterozygous loss-of-function mutations in the CASR gene and is characterized by moderately elevated serum calcium concentrations, low urinary calcium excretion and inappropriately normal or mildly elevated parathyroid hormone (PTH) concentrations. We performed a clinical and genetic characterization of one patient suspected of familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type I. Patient presented persistent hypercalcemia with normal PTH and 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels. The CASR was screened for mutations by PCR followed by direct Sanger sequencing and, in order to detect large deletions or duplications, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) was used. One large deletion of 973 nucleotides in heterozygous state (c.1733-255_2450del) was detected. This is the first large deletion detected by the MLPA technique in the CASR gene.
Learning points:
-
Molecular studies are important to confirm the differential diagnosis of FHH from primary hyperparathyroidism.
-
Large deletions or duplications in the CASR gene can be detected by the MLPA technique.
-
Understanding the functional impact of the mutations is critical for leading pharmacological research and could facilitate the therapy of patients.
