Diagnosis and Treatment > Signs and Symptoms
Search for other papers by Daniela Gallo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sara Rosetti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ilaria Marcon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Elisabetta Armiraglio in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Antonina Parafioriti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Graziella Pinotti in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Giuseppe Perrucchini in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Bohdan Patera in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Linda Gentile in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Maria Laura Tanda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Luigi Bartalena in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Eliana Piantanida in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Brown tumors are osteoclastic, benign lesions characterized by fibrotic stroma, intense vascularization and multinucleated giant cells. They are the terminal expression of the bone remodelling process occurring in advanced hyperparathyroidism. Nowadays, due to earlier diagnosis, primary hyperparathyroidism keeps few of the classical manifestations and brown tumors are definitely unexpected. Thus, it may happen that they are misdiagnosed as primary or metastatic bone cancer. Besides bone imaging, endocrine evaluation including measurement of serum parathyroid hormone and calcium (Ca) levels supports the pathologist to address the diagnosis. Herein, a case of multiple large brown tumors misdiagnosed as a non-treatable osteosarcoma is described, with special regards to diagnostic work-up. After selective parathyroidectomy, treatment with denosumab was initiated and a regular follow-up was established. The central role of multidisciplinary approach involving pathologist, endocrinologist and oncologist in the diagnostic and therapeutic work-up is reported. In our opinion, the discussion of this case would be functional especially for clinicians and pathologists not used to the differential diagnosis in uncommon bone disorders.
Learning points:
-
Brown tumors develop during the remodelling process of bone in advanced and long-lasting primary or secondary hyperparathyroidism.
-
Although rare, they should be considered during the challenging diagnostic work-up of giant cell lesions.
-
Coexistence of high parathyroid hormone levels and hypercalcemia in primary hyperparathyroidism is crucial for the diagnosis.
-
A detailed imaging study includes bone X-ray, bone scintiscan and total body CT; to rule out bone malignancy, evaluation of bone lesion biopsy should include immunostaining for neoplastic markers as H3G34W and Ki67 index.
-
If primary hyperparathyroidism is confirmed, selective parathyroidectomy is the first-line treatment.
-
In advanced bone disease, treatment with denosumab should be considered, ensuring a strict control of Ca levels.
Search for other papers by Tessa Glyn in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Beverley Harris in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kate Allen in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
We present the case of a 57-year-old lady who had a delayed diagnosis of central hypothyroidism on a background of Grave’s thyrotoxicosis and a partial thyroidectomy. During the twenty years following her partial thyroidectomy, the patient developed a constellation of symptoms and new diagnoses, which were investigated by numerous specialists from various fields, namely rheumatology, renal and respiratory. She developed significantly impaired renal function and raised creatine kinase (CK). She was also referred to a tertiary neurology service for investigation of myositis, which resulted in inconclusive muscle biopsies. Recurrently normal TSH results reassured clinicians that this did not relate to previous thyroid dysfunction. In 2015, she developed increased shortness of breath and was found to have a significant pericardial effusion. The clinical biochemist reviewed this lady’s blood results and elected to add on a free T4 (fT4) and free T3 (fT3), which were found to be <0.4 pmol/L (normal range (NR): 12–22 pmol/L) and 0.3 pmol/L (NR: 3.1–6.8 pmol/L), respectively. She was referred urgently to the endocrine services and commenced on Levothyroxine replacement for profound central hypothyroidism. Her other pituitary hormones and MRI were normal. In the following year, her eGFR and CK normalised, and her myositis symptoms, breathlessness and pericardial effusion resolved. One year following initiation of Levothyroxine, her fT4 and fT3 were in the normal range for the first time. This case highlights the pitfalls of relying purely on TSH for excluding hypothyroidism and the devastating effect the delay in diagnosis had upon this patient.
Learning points:
-
Isolated central hypothyroidism is very rare, but should be considered irrespective of previous thyroid disorders.
-
If clinicians have a strong suspicion that a patient may have hypothyroidism despite normal TSH, they should ensure they measure fT3 and fT4.
-
Laboratories that do not perform fT3 and fT4 routinely should review advice sent to requesting clinicians to include a statement explaining that a normal TSH excludes primary but not secondary hypothyroidism.
-
Thyroid function tests should be performed routinely in patients presenting with renal impairment or a raised CK.
