Diagnosis and Treatment > Signs and Symptoms
National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland
Search for other papers by Michelle Maher in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Federico Roncaroli in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nigel Mendoza in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Karim Meeran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Natalie Canham in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Monika Kosicka-Slawinska in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Birgitta Bernhard in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David Collier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Juliana Drummond in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Kassiani Skordilis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Nicola Tufton in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Anastasia Gontsarova in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Niamh Martin in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Márta Korbonits in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Florian Wernig in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Symptomatic pituitary adenomas occur with a prevalence of approximately 0.1% in the general population. It is estimated that 5% of pituitary adenomas occur in a familial setting, either in isolated or syndromic form. Recently, loss-of-function mutations in genes encoding succinate dehydrogenase subunits (SDHx) or MYC-associated factor X (MAX) have been found to predispose to pituitary adenomas in co-existence with paragangliomas or phaeochromocytomas. It is rare, however, for a familial SDHx mutation to manifest as an isolated pituitary adenoma. We present the case of a pituitary lactotroph adenoma in a patient with a heterozygous germline SDHB mutation, in the absence of concomitant neoplasms. Initially, the adenoma showed biochemical response but poor tumour shrinkage in response to cabergoline; therefore, transsphenoidal surgery was performed. Following initial clinical improvement, tumour recurrence was identified 15 months later. Interestingly, re-initiation of cabergoline proved successful and the lesion demonstrated both biochemical response and tumour shrinkage. Our patient’s SDHB mutation was identified when we realised that her father had a metastatic paraganglioma, prompting genetic testing. Re-inspection of the histopathological report of the prolactinoma confirmed cells with vacuolated cytoplasm. This histological feature is suggestive of an SDHx mutation and should prompt further screening for mutations by immunohistochemistry and/or genetic testing. Surprisingly, immunohistochemistry of this pituitary adenoma demonstrated normal SDHB expression, despite loss of SDHB expression in the patient’s father’s paraganglioma.
Learning points:
-
Pituitary adenomas may be the presenting and/or sole feature of SDHB mutation-related disease.
-
SDHx mutated pituitary adenomas may display clinically aggressive behaviour and demonstrate variable response to medical treatment.
-
Histological evidence of intracytoplasmic vacuoles in a pituitary adenoma might suggest an SDH-deficient tumour and should prompt further screening for SDHx mutations.
-
Immunohistochemistry may not always predict the presence of SDHx mutations.
Search for other papers by Syed Ali Imran in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Khaled A Aldahmani in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Lynette Penney in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Sidney E Croul in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David B Clarke in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by David M Collier in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Donato Iacovazzo in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Márta Korbonits in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Early-onset acromegaly causing gigantism is often associated with aryl-hydrocarbon-interacting receptor protein (AIP) mutation, especially if there is a positive family history. A15y male presented with tiredness and visual problems. He was 201 cm tall with a span of 217 cm. He had typical facial features of acromegaly, elevated IGF-1, secondary hypogonadism and a large macroadenoma. His paternal aunt had a history of acromegaly presenting at the age of 35 years. Following transsphenoidal surgery, his IGF-1 normalized and clinical symptoms improved. He was found to have a novel AIP mutation destroying the stop codon c.991T>C; p.*331R. Unexpectedly, his father and paternal aunt were negative for this mutation while his mother and older sister were unaffected carriers, suggesting that his aunt represents a phenocopy.
Learning points:
-
Typical presentation for a patient with AIP mutation with excess growth and eunuchoid proportions.
-
Unusual, previously not described AIP variant with loss of the stop codon.
-
Phenocopy may occur in families with a disease-causing germline mutation.
Department of Experimental Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Search for other papers by Emilia Sbardella in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by George Farah in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ahmed Fathelrahman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Simon Cudlip in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Olaf Ansorge in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Niki Karavitaki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Ashley B Grossman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Pituitary adenomas are a common intracranial neoplasm, usually demonstrating a benign phenotype. They can be classified according to pathological, radiological or clinical behaviour as typical, atypical or carcinomas, invasive or noninvasive, and aggressive or nonaggressive. Prolactinomas account for 40–60% of all pituitary adenomas, with dopamine agonists representing the first-line treatment and surgery/radiotherapy reserved for drug intolerance/resistance or in neuro-ophthalmological emergencies. We present the case of a 62-year-old man with an apparently indolent prolactin-secreting macroadenoma managed with partial resection and initially showing a biochemical response to cabergoline. Five years later, the tumour became resistant to cabergoline, despite a substantial increase in dosage, showing rapid growth and causing worsening of vision. The patient then underwent two further transsphenoidal operations and continued on high-dose cabergoline; despite these interventions, the tumour continued enlarging and prolactin increased to 107 269 U/L. Histology of the third surgical specimen demonstrated features of aggressive behaviour (atypical adenoma with a high cell proliferation index) not present in the tumour removed at the first operation. Subsequently, he was referred for radiotherapy aiming to control tumour growth.
Learning points:
-
The development of secondary resistance to dopamine agonists (DAs) is a serious sign as it may be associated with de-differentiation of the prolactinoma and thus of aggressive or malignant transformation.
-
Significant de-differentiation of the adenoma documented on consecutive histologies suggests a possible transition to malignancy.
-
A combination of histological ‘alarm’ features associated with persistent growth and escape from DAs treatment in recurrent adenomas should alert clinicians and demands close follow-up.
-
A multidisciplinary approach by pathologists, endocrinologists and neurosurgeons is essential.
Search for other papers by Derick Adams in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Philip A Kern in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Pituitary abscess is a relatively uncommon cause of pituitary hormone deficiencies and/or a suprasellar mass. Risk factors for pituitary abscess include prior surgery, irradiation and/or pathology of the suprasellar region as well as underlying infections. We present the case of a 22-year-old female presenting with a spontaneous pituitary abscess in the absence of risk factors described previously. Her initial presentation included headache, bitemporal hemianopia, polyuria, polydipsia and amenorrhoea. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of her pituitary showed a suprasellar mass. As the patient did not have any risk factors for pituitary abscess or symptoms of infection, the diagnosis was not suspected preoperatively. She underwent transsphenoidal resection and purulent material was seen intraoperatively. Culture of the surgical specimen showed two species of alpha hemolytic Streptococcus, Staphylococcus capitis and Prevotella melaninogenica. Urine and blood cultures, dental radiographs and transthoracic echocardiogram failed to show any source of infection that could have caused the pituitary abscess. The patient was treated with 6weeks of oral metronidazole and intravenous vancomycin. After 6weeks of transsphenoidal resection and just after completion of antibiotic therapy, her headache and bitemporal hemianopsia resolved. However, nocturia and polydipsia from central diabetes insipidus and amenorrhoea from hypogonadotrophic hypogonadism persisted.
Learning points
-
Pituitary abscesses typically develop in patients who have other sources of infection or disruption of the normal suprasellar anatomy by either surgery, irradiation or pre-existing pathology; however, they can develop in the absence of known risk factors.
-
Patients with pituitary abscesses typically complain of headache, visual changes and symptoms of pituitary hormone deficiencies.
-
As other pituitary neoplasms present with similar clinical findings, the diagnosis of pituitary abscess is often not suspected until transsphenoidal resection is performed.
-
Prompt surgical and medical treatment of pituitary abscess is necessary, which typically results in improvement in headache and visual changes; however, pituitary hormone deficiencies are typically often permanent.
Search for other papers by Apostolos K A Karagiannis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Fotini Dimitropoulou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Athanasios Papatheodorou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Stavroula Lyra in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andreas Seretis in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Search for other papers by Andromachi Vryonidou in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Summary
Pituitary abscess is a rare life-threating entity that is usually misdiagnosed as a pituitary tumor with a definite diagnosis only made postoperatively. Over the last several decades, advances in healthcare have led to a significant decrease in morbidity and mortality due to pituitary abscess. We report a case of a 34-year-old woman who was admitted to our department for investigation of a pituitary mass and with symptoms of pituitary dysfunction, headaches and impaired vision. During her admission, she developed meningitis-like symptoms and was treated with antibiotics. She eventually underwent transsphenoidal surgery for excision of the pituitary mass. A significant amount of pus was evident intraoperatively; however, no pathogen was isolated. Six months later, the patient was well and had full recovery of the anterior pituitary function. Her menses returned, and she was only on treatment with desmopressin for diabetes insipidus that developed postoperatively.
Learning points
-
Pituitary abscess is a rare disease and the reported clinical features vary mimicking other pituitary lesions.
-
The diagnosis of pituitary abscess is often very difficult to make and rarely included in the differential.
-
The histological findings of acute inflammatory infiltration confirm the diagnosis of pituitary abscess.
-
Medical and surgical treatment is usually recommended upon diagnosis of a pituitary abscess.
