Diagnosis and Treatment > Signs and Symptoms > Abdominal lump

You are looking at 1 - 6 of 6 items

Sakshi Jhawar Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Search for other papers by Sakshi Jhawar in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rahul Lakhotia Medical Oncology Service, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Search for other papers by Rahul Lakhotia in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mari Suzuki Metabolic Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Search for other papers by Mari Suzuki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
James Welch Metabolic Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Search for other papers by James Welch in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Sunita K Agarwal Metabolic Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Search for other papers by Sunita K Agarwal in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
John Sharretts Metabolic Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Search for other papers by John Sharretts in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Maria Merino Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Search for other papers by Maria Merino in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Mark Ahlman Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Search for other papers by Mark Ahlman in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Jenny E Blau Metabolic Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Search for other papers by Jenny E Blau in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
William F Simonds Metabolic Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Search for other papers by William F Simonds in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Jaydira Del Rivero Pediatric Oncology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Clinical Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Search for other papers by Jaydira Del Rivero in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an autosomal dominant condition characterized by parathyroid, anterior pituitary and enteropancreatic endocrine cell tumors. Neuroendocrine tumors occur in approximately in 5–15% of MEN1 patients. Very few cases of ovarian NETs have been reported in association with clinical MEN1 and without genetic testing confirmation. Thirty-three-year-old woman with MEN1 was found to have right adnexal mass on computed tomography (CT). Attempt at laparoscopic removal was unsuccessful, and mass was removed via a minilaparotomy in piecemeal fashion. Pathology showed ovarian NET arising from a teratoma. Four years later, patient presented with recurrence involving the pelvis and anterior abdominal wall. She was treated with debulking surgery and somatostatin analogs (SSAs). Targeted DNA sequencing analysis on the primary adnexal mass as well as the recurrent abdominal wall tumor confirmed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the MEN1 gene locus. This case represents to our knowledge, the first genetically confirmed case of ovarian NET arising by a MEN1 mechanism in a patient with MEN1. Extreme caution should be exercised during surgery as failure to remove an ovarian NET en masse can result in peritoneal seeding and recurrence. For patients with advanced ovarian NETs, systemic therapy options include SSAs, peptide receptor radioligand therapy (PRRT) and novel agents targeting mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF).

Learning points:

  • Ovarian NET can arise from a MEN1 mechanism, and any adnexal mass in a MEN1 patient can be considered as a possible malignant NET.

  • Given the rarity of this disease, limited data are available on prognostication and treatment. Management strategies are extrapolated from evidence available in NETs from primaries of other origins.

  • Care should be exercised to remove ovarian NETs en bloc as failure to do so may result in peritoneal seeding and recurrence.

  • Treatment options for advanced disease include debulking surgery, SSAs, TKIs, mTOR inhibitors, PRRT and chemotherapy.

Open access
Xin Feng Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta,Canada

Search for other papers by Xin Feng in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Gregory Kline Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta,Canada

Search for other papers by Gregory Kline in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

In a 61-year-old Caucasian male with prostate cancer, leuprolide and bicalutamide failed to suppress the androgens. He presented to endocrinology with persistently normal testosterone and incidental massive (up to 18 cm) bilateral adrenal myelolipomas on CT scan. Blood test did not reveal metanephrine excess. The patient was noted to have short stature (151 cm) and primary infertility. Elementary school photographs demonstrated precocious puberty. Physical examination revealed palpable abdominal (adrenal) masses. Abiraterone and glucocorticoid treatment was commenced with excellent suppression of testosterone. Genetic testing revealed a mutation in CYP21A2 confirming 21-hydroxylase-deficient congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH). Association of large myelolipomas with CAH has been reported in the literature. Our case highlights the importance of considering CAH in patients with non-suppressed testosterone despite androgen deprivation therapy. Large myelolipomas should raise the suspicion of congenital adrenal hyperplasia.

Learning points:

  • Adrenal myelolipomas are rare benign lesions that are more common in patients with longstanding untreated congenital adrenal hyperplasia thought to be due to ACTH stimulation.

  • Consider undiagnosed congenital adrenal hyperplasia in patients with adrenal myelolipoma.

  • Glucocorticoid replacement may be an efficacious treatment for patients with prostate cancer and CAH. Abiraterone therapy has a risk of adrenal crisis if glucocorticoids are not replaced.

Open access
Kohei Saitoh Departments of Diabetes and Endocrinology

Search for other papers by Kohei Saitoh in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Takako Yonemoto Departments of Diabetes and Endocrinology
Medical Genetics, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan

Search for other papers by Takako Yonemoto in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Takeshi Usui Medical Genetics, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan

Search for other papers by Takeshi Usui in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Kazuhiro Takekoshi Division of Sports Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan

Search for other papers by Kazuhiro Takekoshi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Makoto Suzuki Departments of Pathology

Search for other papers by Makoto Suzuki in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Yoshiharu Nakashima Departments of Urology, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan

Search for other papers by Yoshiharu Nakashima in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Koji Yoshimura Departments of Urology, Shizuoka General Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan

Search for other papers by Koji Yoshimura in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Rieko Kosugi Departments of Diabetes and Endocrinology

Search for other papers by Rieko Kosugi in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Tatsuo Ogawa Departments of Diabetes and Endocrinology

Search for other papers by Tatsuo Ogawa in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
Tatsuhide Inoue Departments of Diabetes and Endocrinology

Search for other papers by Tatsuhide Inoue in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

Pheochromocytomas (PCCs) and paragangliomas (PGLs) are rare tumours with a heterogeneous genetic background. Up to 40% of apparently sporadic PCC/PGL cases carry 1 of the 12 gene germline mutations conferring genetic susceptibility to PCC/PGL. Although the precise mechanisms are unclear, TMEM127 is one of the rare responsible genes for PCC/PGL. Here we report the case of a patient with familial PCC having a novel TMEM127 variant (c.119C > T, p.S40F). In silico prediction analysis to evaluate the functional significance of this variant suggested that it is a disease-causing variant. A PCC on the left side was considered to be the dominant lesion, and unilateral adrenalectomy was performed. The histopathologic findings were consistent with benign PCC. A loss of heterogeneity of the TMEM127 variant was detected in the surgically removed tumour.

Learning points:

  • c.119C > T (p.S40F) is a novel TMEM127 variant that can cause pheochromocytoma.

  • The tumour showed loss of heterozygosity of this TMEM127 variant.

  • The clinical phenotype of this mutation is putative bilateral pheochromocytoma in the 4th decade.

  • Unilateral adrenalectomy may be performed as the initial surgery in such cases.

Open access
Stephanie Teasdale
Search for other papers by Stephanie Teasdale in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
and
Elham Reda Endocrinology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Southport, Queensland, Australia

Search for other papers by Elham Reda in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

We present two cases of adrenal phaeochromocytoma in patients with a previous diagnosis of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). One had an adrenergic phenotype. The other had a more noradrenergic phenotype. Both had large primary tumours, which increases the likelihood of malignancy. Both also had elevated plasma-free methoxytyramine, which has been linked with malignancy even in non-SDHB phaeochromocytomas.

Learning points

  • Phaeochromocytoma can have varied clinical presentations.

  • Methoxytyramine can be useful in the biochemical work-up of both SDHB-positive and SDHB-negative phaeochromocytoma.

  • The utility of methoxytyramine as a marker of malignancy in NF1-related phaeochromocytoma is unclear, and cases with elevated titres warrant longer follow-up.

Open access
Avital Nahmias Neuroendocrine Tumor Unit, Endocrinology and Metabolism Service, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

Search for other papers by Avital Nahmias in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg Neuroendocrine Tumor Unit, Endocrinology and Metabolism Service, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

Search for other papers by Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
Asher Salmon Department of Oncology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Kiryat Hadassah, Jerusalem, POB 12000, 91120, Israel

Search for other papers by Asher Salmon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
David J Gross Neuroendocrine Tumor Unit, Endocrinology and Metabolism Service, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel

Search for other papers by David J Gross in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

Approximately 35% of the pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) are functional, the most common of which is an insulinoma. Rarely can initially nonfunctioning tumor undergo biological transformation to a hormone-secreting tumor with subsequent changes in the clinical picture. We present here three unique patients with long-standing pNETs who developed life-threatening hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia along with tumor progression. In two of the patients, everolimus (Afinitor) was administered in an attempt to control both tumor growth and hypoglycemia. In two cases everolimus therapy resulted in the abolishment of hypoglycemia and induced significant tumor regression; however these beneficial responses were transient. These cases highlight the exceptional ability of pNETs to change biological behavior in parallel with disease progression. Our experience concurs with recently published studies demonstrating the utility of everolimus for the control of both hypoglycemia and tumor progression.

Learning points

  • Nonfunctional pNET can gain new features such as insulin secretion with related morbidity.

  • Gain of function in a previously nonfunctional pNET signifies tumor progression and is usually associated with poor prognosis.

  • Everolimus proved to be a viable treatment for hypoglycemia in insulinoma patients and was also proven highly effective in the patients presented here.

  • As disease progresses, the effect of everolimus on hypoglycemia wanes. We report for the first time the development of hypoglycemia during everolimus treatment.

Open access
P Hanson Endocrinology, University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK

Search for other papers by P Hanson in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
M Pandit Endocrinology, University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK

Search for other papers by M Pandit in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
V Menon Endocrinology, University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK

Search for other papers by V Menon in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
,
S Roberts Endocrinology, University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK

Search for other papers by S Roberts in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close
, and
T M Barber Endocrinology, University Hospital of Coventry and Warwickshire, Coventry, UK

Search for other papers by T M Barber in
Google Scholar
PubMed
Close

Summary

The case is a 34-year-old woman with long-standing type 1 diabetes mellitus with existing follow-up in the outpatient clinic at the Warwickshire Institute for the Study of Diabetes, Endocrinology and Metabolism, UHCW. She had maintained good glycaemic control and glycaemic stability with basal bolus regimen for many years. She had not developed any diabetes-related complications and had no other co-morbidities. Six months ago, she presented to A&E with sudden-onset, well-localised and severe pain in the right iliac fossa, just lateral to the para-umbilical area. Her biochemistry was normal. Ultrasound scan, however, revealed a right-sided ovarian cyst, which was thought to have caused pain to her. She was discharged from A&E with simple analgesia. On subsequent gynaecological follow-up 4 weeks later, her pain remained severe and examination revealed an exquisitely tender subcutaneous nodule at the same location measuring 2 cm in diameter. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan at the time revealed a 1 cm mass in the subcutaneous adipose tissue, which co-localised to her pain. The mass demonstrated a central fat signal surrounded by a peripheral ring: observations consistent with fat necrosis. There were other smaller subcutaneous nodules also observed in the left para-umbilical area. Subsequent surgical resection of the main area of fat necrosis was performed. The patient made an excellent recovery and her pain resolved post-operatively. Histology confirmed the presence of fat necrosis. Fat necrosis is a rare complication of s.c. insulin injection. This case illustrates the importance of considering this diagnosis in patients who inject insulin and develop localised injection-site pain.

Learning points

  • Fat necrosis is a rare complication of insulin injections that can manifest with severe, persistent and well-localised pain.

  • Fat necrosis can masquerade as other pathologies causing diagnostic confusion.

  • The imaging modality of choice for accurate diagnosis of fat necrosis is MRI.

  • Histological confirmation of fat necrosis is important.

  • Appropriate management of localised fat necrosis is surgical excision, with avoidance of further insulin injections into the affected area.

Open access