A case of low serum insulin levels in a patient with insulinoma

Background

Insulinoma, by definition, is the tumor of the pancreas that produces excessive amounts of insulin. In very few cases, insulin levels are low despite clinical evaluation suggestive of pancreatic adenoma. In cases with low insulin concentration, accurate diagnosis requires other clinical indicators such as C-peptide, CT scan and endoscopic ultrasonography. The management of the tumor requires precise localization and surgical resection for a definite treatment. We hereby present a case of an asymptomatic female with insulinoma that presents with low serum insulin levels.

Case presentation

A 50-year-old female was brought to our emergency department because of conscious disturbance on the previous night. She did not complain of nausea, palpitations or diaphoresis. Her daughter denied alcohol consumption, use of illicit drug and any suicide attempt. Physical examination was insignificant. Her weight was 56kg and had not changed recently. History revealed that she had had depression for over 3years. She also experienced one episode of mild dizziness when standing after an overnight fast in the past, but it had resolved spontaneously and had been short-lived. The patient denied a history of diabetes mellitus and any use of medication.

Investigation

Laboratory workup revealed significantly low glucose (41mg/dL), insulin (<1.0μIU/mL) and C-peptide (1.29ng/mL) levels. Serum levels of electrolyte, ammonia and ketone body are within normal limits (Table 1). CXR and EKG showed no significant finding. She was admitted for the evaluation of hypoglycemia. In the wards, she received a comprehensive check for hypoglycemia. Measurement of anti-insulin antibody (3.90%), IGF1 (163.29ng/mL) and IGF2 (421ng/mL) levels was done in addition to that of glucose, c-peptide and insulin levels (Table 2). Abdominal CT scan showed a 1.1cm hypervascular nodule in pancreatic tail, raising the suspicion of an islet cell tumor (Fig. 1). To rule out the possibility of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), she was screened for hormonal imbalance. Of all the hormone levels measured (FSH, LH, PTH, cortisol, prolactin, T₃, T₄ and insulin), only prolactin levels appeared to be elevated (47.2ng/mL), pointing out a possible prolactin-secreting adenoma in the pituitary gland, this was further confirmed by the presence of a 7mm microadenoma in the left paramedian aspect of the pituitary gland. However, the patient did not show signs or symptoms related to prolactin over-secretion (headaches, vision problems that could be easily explained, menstrual cycle changes, mood swings and weight changes).

View Full Size

CT scan of abdomen revealed a hypodense solid lesion, without contrast enhancement, of about 1.0cm in size at anterior aspect of pancreatic tail (marked with arrow).

Citation: Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports 2016, 1; 10.1530/EDM-16-0041

• Download Figure
• Download figure as PowerPoint slide

Treatment

We closely monitored her glucose levels and any potential hypoglycemic symptoms. Supportive treatment was implemented. Contrary to our belief of a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, her insulin and C-peptide levels were low – 1.67μIU/mL and 1.03ng/mL respectively. Although her blood glucose levels frequently dropped below 50mg/dL after an overnight fast, she remained free of hypoglycemic symptom throughout the course. She was discharged after her condition stabilized.

The patient was asked to perform self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) after she returned home. She was also encouraged to prevent hypoglycemia with high carbohydrate intake. SMBG data suggested a regular pattern of blood glucose levels. Her blood glucose was usually lowest in the morning, around 45mg/dL, and highest during the afternoon. MRI performed at the outpatient clinic was consistent with previous CT result, most likely a pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. Based on clinical, biochemical and imaging studies, the patient was referred to the surgical division. Due to her persistent hypoglycemic pattern, we arranged a laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy for resection of the tumor. Under general anesthesia, a 1.2×1.0cm homogenous well-encapsulated tumor was resected from the pancreatic tail without local complications or bleeding (Fig. 2). Pathologic examination revealed neuroendocrine tumor grade 1 (pT1) as the final diagnosis.

View Full Size

Surgical specimen revealed a homogenous, light yellowish in color, solid tumor with clear margin in the center of a piece of wedge-resected pancreatic tissue

Citation: Endocrinology, Diabetes & Metabolism Case Reports 2016, 1; 10.1530/EDM-16-0041

• Download Figure
• Download figure as PowerPoint slide

Outcome and follow-up

At 2-day follow-up, her blood glucose levels ranged from 84 to 146mg/dL, and no hypoglycemic episode was observed after an overnight fast (Table 3). We continued to monitor her glucose levels in the outpatient clinic every 1month for a period of 6months. She did not have another episode of spontaneous hypoglycemia.

Discussion

Insulinomas are characterized clinically by Whipple triad: episodic hypoglycemia, central nervous system (CNS) dysfunction, and dramatic reversal of CNS abnormalities with glucose administration (1). Our patient did not show any symptoms except for the first encounter where she had conscious disturbance. She remained asymptomatic throughout the treatment course, although glucose levels frequently dropped to around 40mg/dL.

Because symptomatic hypoglycemia often manifests as CNS dysfunction, patients with hypoglycemia have often been misdiagnosed with neurological or psychiatric disorders (2). Our patient had a long history of psychiatric disorder, which can sometimes present with neurologic disturbances. The fact that the patient was not taking any antidepressant and that she had not had an episode for over a year suggested that her mental condition was relatively stable. She regained consciousness after administration of oral carbohydrate, therefore hypoglycemia seems to be the correct diagnosis. However, it is pivotal to identify all the underlying diseases while analyzing the reason for conscious disturbance.

For 75years, the 72-h fasting test has been considered the ‘gold standard’ for the diagnosis of insulinoma. However, some studies questioned the necessity to extend the fasting to 72h. In 170 patients operated on for insulinoma who underwent prolonged fasts according to a standard protocol at the Mayo Clinic, the fast was terminated within 12h in 33%, 24h in 65%, 36h in 84%, 48h in 93% and 72h in 99% (3). Hirshberg et al. also conducted a similar study to assess the need for a 72-h fast for the diagnosis of insulinoma and concluded that 48-h fast should replace the 72-h fast as the new diagnostic standard in textbooks and hospital protocols (4). We did not conduct a formal 72-h fast test because our patient had spontaneous hypoglycemia as low as 40mg/dL after a 12-h overnight fast almost every morning. Her glucose level returned to the normal value upon having breakfast. A drop in glucose level to below 30mg/dL as well as the appearance of neurologic symptoms could be anticipated if we extended the fast to 24h, but we considered it wise and humane to avoid inconvenience and hardship to the patient. An accurate diagnosis is required because of implications for radiologic studies and potential surgical intervention. The diagnostic accuracy of the prolonged fast for insulinoma in a series by Van Bon et al. was reported to be high, with sensitivity and specificity of 89 and 100%, respectively (5).

In most cases, the diagnosis for insulinoma is usually a combination of satisfying the criteria of Whipple’s triad, laboratory tests, imaging studies and, to a lesser extent, histologic findings (6). However, diagnosis can be difficult at times. Failure of endogenous insulin secretion to be suppressed by hypoglycemia is the hallmark of an insulinoma (7). Yet our patient repeatedly presents with abnormally low insulin and moderate C-peptide levels, making it difficult to identify the disease before we ordered abdominal CT scan. The Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guidelines (ESCPG) were used to diagnose insulinoma. The ESCPG define endogenous hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia as having a plasma glucose level of <3.0mmol/L (55mg/dL), an insulin level of ≥18pmol/L (3.0µU/mL), a C-peptide level of ≥0.2nmol/L (0.6ng/mL), and/or a proinsulin level of ≥5.0pmol/L (8). This definition was not clear regarding how many of these criteria should be met to confirm the diagnosis of insulinoma. A comprehensive study discussing the clinical implication of this criteria reported that by meeting two of the criteria, mainly plasma glucose level of <3.0mmol/L (55mg/dL) and C-peptide level of ≥0.2nmol/L (0.6ng/mL), two of the four criteria that our patient met, the sensitivity and specificity could be 100 and 83%, respectively. However, the sensitivity and specificity could be 100 and 89% if all three criteria were met (9). Hypoglycemia with low insulin and C-peptide levels often points to the consideration of non-islet cell tumor hypoglycemia (NICTH). In NICTH patients, the serum levels of insulin, C-peptide and IGF1 are usually decreased or undetectable. The serum IGF2 levels may be elevated, decreased or normal. Low serum insulin in combination with elevated levels of ‘big’-IGF2 (partially processed forms of pro-IGF2) and an increased IGF2:IGF1 ratio would confirm the diagnosis (10). However, given that our patient’s IGF1 (163.29ng/mL) and IGF2 (421ng/mL) levels were normal and the IGF2:IGF1 ratio was not increased, NICTH is not likely to be the diagnosis. Another type of endogenous hypoglycemia – autoimmune form of hypoglycemia – should also be considered. However, patients with autoimmune hypoglycemia tend to have high levels of anti-insulin and/or insulin receptor antibodies. This possibility could also be ruled out due to low levels of anti-insulin antibodies (3.90%) in the patient’s body.

Despite all the deductions from biochemical criteria, imaging studies are still required for accurate identification of the tumor’s size and location. In conclusion, our insulinoma patient who presented with low serum insulin levels informed us that if the supposedly high insulin levels failed to rise, C-peptide levels along with imaging studies could be the alternative indicators that this patient suffers from insulinoma.

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.

Patient consent

Written and oral informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication.

Author contribution statement

Chun-Han Lo drafted the manuscript, collected all the required data and images for the case, and came up with the discussion points of the case. Ding-Ping Sun revised the manuscript.